compliance
← back to home
🇮🇸Security & Continuity · Iceland

Service Scenario

from security assumptions to a testable continuity plan.

A realistic review for a small team that pays for security and backup but cannot prove what would happen in an incident.

Security & Continuity ReviewScoped Implementation & Advisory1-2 weeks
The Challenge

A company has endpoint security, mailbox protection, backup, and an MSP portal. The tools look reassuring, but ownership is unclear: who responds first, what gets restored, how long it takes, and what management should do in the first hour.

Kastro's Approach

Kastro reviews coverage, backup reality, reporting, and incident assumptions, then creates a prioritized continuity plan and simple runbooks for likely incidents.

APPROACH

how we did it.

01

Review endpoint, identity, email, backup, and MSP coverage

02

Check restore documentation and identify a safe validation exercise

03

Prioritize control gaps and provider findings by practical risk

04

Create first-hour runbooks for likely incidents

05

Identify where specialist SOC or incident response would be warranted

Impact & metrics

Clear

Ownership

Who does what during common incidents

Testable

Restore

Backup assumptions converted into validation steps

Ranked

Priorities

Fix first, defer, or push to vendor

Honest

Scope

No pretend 24/7 SOC from a one-person practice

ready to make the next decision clearer?

Start with a bounded review. Send the invoices, vendors, renewals, and worries, and Kastro will turn them into practical next steps.